Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Wrongly Denied Disability Benefits to Montana Paralegal with Cancer
A federal court in Montana ruled in favor of a paralegal seeking long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits from Fortis Benefits Insurance Company (“Fortis”) after brain and bone cancer forced her to stop working.
Ms. Elliot was diagnosed with breast cancer in 1995, successfully underwent treatment, and her cancer was found to be in complete remission. To decrease the risk that she would develop cancer in the future, she was prescribed Tamoxifen beginning in July 1996. During follow-up appointments in 1997 and as late as September 1999, Ms. Elliot’s oncologists deemed her cancer-free.
On September 27, 1999, Ms. Elliot began a new job as a paralegal and received LTD coverage under her employer’s policy with Fortis. In December 1999, Ms. Elliot’s doctor noted elevated levels of cancer antigens and, on August 19, 2000, she was diagnosed with brain and bone cancer. Terminally ill, Ms. Elliot filed a claim for LTD benefits.
The Disability Policy
The LTD policy excluded benefits for any disability caused by a pre-existing condition, which was defined, in part, as follows:
A pre-existing condition means an injury, sickness, or pregnancy … which you:
- Consulted with or received advice from a licensed medical practitioner; or
- Received medical care, treatment, or services, including taking drugs, during the 3 months (“look back period”) that end on the day before you became insured under the policy.
Fortis’ Claim Review and the Court’s Decision
On October 30, 2000, Fortis sent Ms. Elliot a letter explaining the pre-existing condition limitation of her policy. However, Fortis included a requirement (not actually found in the policy) that a claimant would need to return to work for at least one full day following three consecutive months of nontreatment. Because Ms. Elliot had taken Tamoxifen and had periodic checkups, Fortis found that her breast cancer was a pre-existing condition and denied her claim.
When Fortis further denied Ms. Elliot’s appeal, she filed a lawsuit to recover her LTD benefits. The court agreed with Ms. Elliot’s doctor that Tamoxifen was not prescribed for the treatment of any active cancer or other disease. Since there was no sickness during the look-back period, there could be no treatment for a sickness. Therefore, the court held that Ms. Elliot did not have a pre-existing condition, as defined by the policy, and was eligible for LTD benefits.
Disability Insurance Companies Have Lawyers. Shouldn’t You?
Because this law firm was created to focus on disability insurance, we have developed an expertise in this complex area of the law.
Our expertise in long-term disability claims means our clients have the backing of a law firm that has attorneys who:
- Are experts in disability claims;
- Fought all major disability insurance companies and know their tactics;
- Atrack record of success;
- Won major disability lawsuits that created good law; and
- Recovered millions of dollars in disability benefits.
All our lawyers commit every day of their legal career to helping people get disability benefits from every major insurance company.
Because federal law applies to most disability insurance claims, we do not have to be located in your state to help. We help clients nationwide.
Call to get experienced disability lawyers on your side with:
- Submitting a disability insurance claim;
- Appealing a long-term disability denial;
- Negotiating a lump-sum settlement; or
- Filing a lawsuit against your disability insurance company.
Call for a free consultation with a disability attorney.