Huge federal court win by Dabdoub Law Firm for a liver transplant surgeon! Click here to read more.

Missouri Court Finds Lincoln Financial's Decision to Terminate Benefits for Nurse Practitioner Unreasonable

A Missouri Court finds Lincoln Financial’s decision to terminate benefits was unreasonable. Lincoln ignored supporting evidence and relied on pieces of its own reviewers report to terminate benefits.

Mr. Flanagan, the claimant in this case, was a nurse practitioner when she became disabled. Her condition included spondylolisthesis, failed lumbar fusion and nerve root scarring. Her treating physicians fully supported her disability. His attending physician statements indicated she could not work in any capacity. None of this seemed to matter to Lincoln.

As part of its review, Lincoln had a medical review done by its own paid doctor. He concluded she was disabled from her own occupation. Lincoln, thus paid her benefits for two years. After two years, it conducted another review to determine if she could work in any occupation. It determined she could perform sedentary work and terminated her benefits.

Ms. Flanagan timely appealed and provided even more evidence of her disability. During the appeal review, Lincoln had another one of its paid doctors review her claim.

Notably, Lincoln's own doctor agreed with Ms. Flanagan’s treating physician that she could not work in any capacity. Lincoln ignored it. Instead it relied on the original review and its vocational reviews and denied her appeal.

The medical evidence in support of disability is overwhelming. Her treating physicians, medical records, and a functional capacity evaluation (“FCE”) all support her inability to work in even a sedentary job. Nonetheless, Lincoln ignored anything that favored disability and instead plucked lines supporting it goal of denying benefits.

The Court considered all this and the internal conflict the insurance company carries as the reviewer and the funder of benefits. The court determined Lincoln was unreasonable in its determination to terminate benefits. Ms. Flanagan’s benefits were reinstated and paid to the date of termination.

It is so important to review everything your insurance carrier used to make its determination on your claim. This kind of “cherry-picking” of the records and reviews happens often. An experienced know to look for this and other tactics used by insurance carriers to meet their ultimate goal of denying benefits.

Our Disability Lawyers Can Help You

This law firm was created with a single purpose in mind: to help people get disability benefits from insurance companies. With that kind of focus, millions of dollars in long-term disability benefits have been paid to our clients.

Every day, our disability lawyers work to get insurance companies to approve long-term disability claims or appeal disability benefits denials. The firm has also won several major lawsuits for disability benefits in federal court.

With so much at stake, shouldn’t you have experienced disability lawyers on your side?

Because federal law applies to most disability insurance claims, we do not have to be located in your state to help.

Call to speak with a disability insurance lawyer.